Welcome to our 15th year of working in the national interest
- refusing to bend to Jewish pressure –
Now with the holiday period waning and individuals getting back to routine we also prepare for our quest to defend what little free expression we have left in Australia and to seek the truth of any matter we consider contentious - and to deflect hatred against Germans by rejecting any guilt about the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah that some individuals still wish to impose on Germans and anyone who cherishes a German heritage.
I spent Christmas alone, something that can be quite daunting on account of emotional baggage – but as one matures there is the realization that if we do not have a home within our own mind, then we will never be happy with our own company, something I consider to be a pre-requisite for a mindset that does not wish to rely on scapegoating for getting through life … from memory Shakespeare said something about not relying on the stars for us being thus and thus but that the fault lies within ourselves!
The following days and New Year’s Eve I spent with my extended family. Interestingly, on 8 January just as we were farewelling guests from home, we saw a young man in the street with an art folder trying to sell paintings. We recognized him immediately as an Israeli. I viewed the pictures but found the scenes depicted to be rather dark and not uplifting and the $190.- price was much too high. Also, when I asked the young man if I could have his contact details - a business card, an email address – he advised that he had nothing on him and this seemed rather strange to me. As he walked off to visit other homes in the street, I noticed a 4-wheel drive slowly stopping near the intersection, the driver lighting a cigarette, then turning into our street and parking near the end and waiting until the young man had completed his task in covering all the homes.
Also during the first few days of the New Year our Internet service provider of over 12 years, exclusively Adelaide-based Adam Internet, had operational problems thereby eliminating our website from the Internet. At the same time our phone landline also malfunctioned and died. These two events happening together justifiably seemed worrying for a number of individuals – but it was not related to our current legal proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia – FCA. In fact, after over a decade of faultless service this was our first real technical interruption to our broadcast transmission. I thank those individuals from around the world who made enquries about my welfare, and I remind supporters that any suggestion of my fleeing from a possible term of imprisonment is not on. Unlike Richard Wagner who fled from Saxony to Switzerland to begin a new life there when he upset the establishment with his vision of social justice, it is not possible in today’s time for me to flee anywhere – the world is my prison, and so I fearlessly face whatever will come my way.
I would like to thank Hilde and Colleen for sending me for my RELAX time Andre Rieu’s Dreaming and the ABC’s Great Classics – much appreciated in times of stress, of which there was much towards the end of 2007.
Also, let me personally thank the supporters who came through with financial donations much needed to cover operational and legal expenses. A big thank you to Christine, Christopher, David, Dagmar, George, Guy, Heinrich, Helga, Helmut, Herman, Ida, Jane, John, Joyce, Helen/Geoff, Ken, Len, Lila, Margit, Mark, Matthew, Michael, Max, Olga, Peter, Ray, Richard, Robert, Spencer, Werner – for assisting in keeping our operations financially viable. Although I still have some debt to eliminate before the next court appearance, and our photocopier is giving up the ghost, again needing a new drum, I sincerely thank you for this continued support. This association of over 14 years has been very productive in that we have helped to expose the Jewish mindset, among other things, that attempts to deprive us of life, as Jeremy Jones stated publicly - that aims to stop us from functioning!
I shall therefore honour the trust you have extended to me, and know that you need to remain in the background for the duration of this fight. I recall meeting Bernard Freedman of the Australian Jewish News in Canberra when we began. The first question he asked me was: Who is financing you? Where’s your money coming from? I think he was disappointed to learn that we are operating on a shoe string, and had it not been for your financial support and for David’s food supply, then I would have closed shop a long time ago. We are definitely not a profitable venture.
A belated thank you must also go to the USA where Elisabeth and Willis Carto and Paul Angel realized the production of my book 40 Days in Teheran.
Here is a brief run-down of what has been happening in the Federal Court of Australia–FCA since my return from attending the 11-12 December 2006 Teheran Holocaust Conference. As I mentioned elsewhere, had I not left Australia early to attend the conference, then the arrest warrant asked for by Jeremy Jones on 5 December 2006 would certainly have prevented my departure for Iran.
One reason why I agreed to offer an apology to the FCA was the financial pressure of court costs being possibly awarded against me, which was lifted as part of the apology. However, I was advised that if a pensioner, there is little that can be taken away – yet, who can forget how Mrs Olga Scully was hounded into voluntary bankruptcy when her persecutors came after their pound of flesh! You see, there is nothing new when dealing with a mindset that is not prepared to compromise, that is out, literally, to kill you – whose method of operating is parasitical. BVut as Art Butz reminded us years ago, such individuals, who don’t know when to stop pushing, will themselves die if they kill their host who gives them life. As I said before, I don’t need Jones but he needs me to keep his enterprise going.
The other reason was that I have always been willing to remove material that someone finds rude, crude or offensive generally. My barrister and I clearly delineated the area the apology covered.
Now my apology – made only to the Federal Court of Australia and not to Jeremy Jones and his Executive Council of Australian Jewry – has become a contentious matter. The Australian Jewish News gloated over the apology and so I withdrew my apology and stopped deleting the alleged offending material from Adelaide Institute’s website.
Immediately Jeremy Jones initiated a court hearing at which Justice Michael Moore assured me that the apology extends only to particular items placed on our website and not to my belief/world view system.
Having had this matter clarified I continued to delete material until I arrived at an item marked for deletion that was a link to an item on another website – the WaybackMachine that saves all global Internet traffic. The apology did not cover the removal of links to other websites, and in fact this linking was a point canvassed specifically when I discussed the apology requirements with my barrister, Mr Paul Charman. I was not to continue to write up and place on our website material that the order mentioned, but that linking to such material was considered to be in order.
And so, what to do? I have now begun an action and issued a Notice of Motion in the FCA that will be considered at the next Directions Hearing set down for 18 February 2008. Therein I will ask the presiding judge to open up/set aside the Apology so that this new matter of placing Internet links on our website can be re-considered because I certainly did not direct my apology to an Internet website link. My aim is to retain my right to place links on our website to whatever material I please – certainly not to be determined by the Jewish mindset as exemplified by Jeremy Jones and the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.
In this respect I draw upon the Canadian experience in censorship where Jewish organisations, via the Human Rights Commission, are also attempting to impose censorship on those who refuse to bend to Jewish pressure by controlling what Internet links individuals place on their websites. Arthur Topham of Radical Press is one such individual who is standing up to Jewish pressure. My comment, below, precedes that of Paul Fromm’s, followed by Arthur Topham’s response to questions posed by the Canadian Human Rights Commission – remember it’s the government body that for decades on behalf of Canada’s organized Jewry hounded and legally persecuted Revisionist Ernst Zündel.
From: Adelaide Institute
Sent: Wednesday, 9 January 2008
Subject: FW: The Radical Press latest victim of the Canadian Human Rights Commission
1. The censorship aim, below, is to restrict Internet websites linking.
2. Please note that in Australia organized Jewry is also attempting legally to criminalize the placing of links to material deemed offensive and hurtful to Jewry.
3. On 28 February 2008 I am attempting to resist this by pointing out that the Internet Archive WaybackMachine archives all material on the Internet, even material that is deemed to be offensive to organized Jewry, such as Holocaust-Shoah material-
From: Paul Fromm email@example.com
Director, CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION
Sent: Sunday, 6 January 2008
Subject: The Radical Press latest victim of the Canadian Human Rights Commission
Dear Free Speech Supporter:
The latest victim of the all-out war on politically incorrect dissent is Arthur Topham
firstname.lastname@example.org of the Radical Press. This website has been a strong champion of free speech for years. It takes a strong stand for social justice and free speech. Sometimes called "anarchist", the site has been an outspoken opponent of Zionism.
That brought it to the attention of Harry Abrams of Victoria, B.C., a radical Zionist who has brought a complaint against the Radical Press. Abrams also brought a complaint against the late Doug Collins then writing for the North Shore News for columns he'd written critical of multiculturalism, in particularly a witty column on the propaganda movie Schindler's List, which he dubbed Swindler's List. Topham is a fighter. Here is his response to a snoopy questionnaire sent out by the CHRC investigators.
B'nai Brith and Harry Abrams accuse the website of promoting "ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel"
On January 3, 2008, Arthur Topham, Editor of the Radical Press responded to yet another politically motivated complaint - the type the Canadian Human Rights Commission love. The complainant this time is Harry Abrams and the misnamed League for "Human Rights" of B'nai Brith.
In their typical Orwellian way, the CHRC demanded answers to 10 questions, whose answers they will later use to send this case to a tribunal. From past experience the only answers they care to see are that your responsible. Whatever defence the victims puts up is just ignored. After all, with show trials, a defence is of little help.
Here is what the Radical Press wrote:
ANSWERS TO CHRC QUESTIONAIRE:
1. Do you own and/or control radicalpress.com? If not, do you know who own's[sic] and/or controls this website?
Yes. I own and control radicalpress.com
2. What is the purpose of this website?
The Radical Press is a Sole Proprietorship business registered with the provincial government in Victoria, B.C. It was formed in 1998 when I began publishing a monthly alternative tabloid known as The Radical. The online version of this hard copy newspaper is known as Radicalpress.com. The purpose of the Radical Press and Radicalpress.com like all news services, is to present to the general public news, information and opinions with which readers can better understand the world they are living in. The forum is provided, as is/was a Letters to the Editor page in The Radical, for public input, debate and feedback.
3. What is the intent of the information/documentation posted on this website?
See answer to Question #2.
4. Who is responsible for editing and/or posting the content of the information/documentation on this website?
5. How are the documents being posted on this website?
Documents are received from various writers on the net either via email or from their own websites or listserv or in hardcopy format or else written by myself and then republished on my site.
6. What is your relationship to radicalpress.com?
The Radical Press is my voice on the world wide web and the vehicle that I use to exercise my human right to freedom of the press and self-expression.
7. Who is the webmaster of this website?
I am the webmaster of radicalpress.com
8. Who is responsible for monitoring the forums on your website? What are
your rules and regulations concerning the postings of messages on the forums? What is the criteria used to remove postings?
I am responsible for all aspects of monitoring the Radical Press forum. The rules and regulations are simple: no racist comments or articles are allowed. If this is discovered on the forum the post is removed and the poster is given a fair warning to not repeat their error. If they do they are deleted from the forum.
9. In reviewing your website, it would appear that radicalpress.com active [sic] links to organizations such as http://www.Stormfront.org. What is thepurpose of making these links available and active?
Again, please see response to Question #2.
10. Who is your present Internet Service Provider (ISP)? Where is it located? Please provide a copy of the ISP's arrangement. Please provide a copy of the agreement with ISP.
All information regarding my ISP, its location and whatever agreements I have with it, are of a private business nature no different than my bank account and credit card information and passwords, etc. No organization, including the CHRC, has a right to this information. I have committed no criminal act and therefore am entitled to retain my legal business rights.
From: Captain May
Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2008
Subject: B’nai Brith vs. Arthur Topham, Publisher & Ghost Troop
For Immediate Release -- January 7, 2008
LEAGUE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS OF B’NAI BRITH CANADA alleges RadicalPress.com owner guilty of “Hate Crimes” toward Jews and citizens of Israel.
QUESNEL, B.C. – Harry Abrams, B.C. representative for the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada has filed a complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) alleging that Arthur Topham, Owner, Publisher & Editor of RadicalPress.com is promoting “hatred toward Jews and citizens of Israel” because of articles on his website that are critical of Zionism and the Jewish state of Israel.
Topham, who has publishing both a hard copy newspaper and an online new site since 1998, said he received the complaint from the CHRC in an unmarked, unregistered envelope November 20, 2008. Contained within was an assortment of documents including a 3-page complaint from Abrams and B’nai Brith and a directive from the CHRC to respond to the Commission by an arranged date.
In a hard-hitting, detailed, and thoroughly documented 13-page Response
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=629 sent to CHRC “hate-team” investigator Sandy Kozak email@example.com on January 3, 2008 the RadicalPress.com publisher stated categorically, “Harry Abrams and his partner in this complaint, the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada are exploiting and abusing the intent of the Canadian Human Rights Act for their own narrow, partisan, ideological purposes” – ones which Topham strongly feels “are not designed to promote and ensure the freedom of expression that the vast majority of Canadians demand and expect but rather are meant to buttress and support the political aims of a foreign state (Israel) of which these organizations are but political extensions.”
Topham further emphasized the fact that there has been a dramatic increase in these types of complaints to the CHRC by both the B’nai Brith and the Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC) since September 11, 2001 when the attack on the World Trade Center In New York city resulting in the loss of 3,000 lives. In the aftermath of that horrid event Canada brought in its new Anti-terrorism Act, c.41 on December 18th, 2001 and along with it came changes to Sec. 13 (1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act which specifically deals with “hate messages”. It is Topham’s contention that both the B’nai Brith and the CJC played a significant role in defining the new “Interpretation” of Sec. 13 (1) – one that now allows both of these partisan groups to lay “hate crimes” complaints against any Internet user or website owner who criticizes Israel’s Zionist ideology and its racist policies toward the Palestinian people.
“It is nothing but a last ditch attempt by these Israeli front organizations to take control of the Internet in Canada and censor all dissenting opinions that don’t support Israel or its Zionist policies,” Topham said. “It is something the vast majority of Canadians are adamantly opposed to yet these groups are becoming bolder by the minute and are now even riding roughshod over Christian organizations, mainstream magazines like MacLeans and alternative media outlets such as the Radical Press.
Topham feels that “It is definitely time a thorough and impartial investigation was carried out to determine the extent of their influence upon our judiciary and our institutions in general. No individual group should be manipulating Canada’s legal system for their own personal gain. Even CBC’s Rex Murphy is taking a strong stand against quasi-judicial bodies like the CHRC and seriously questioning their purpose and legitimacy as they become more and more susceptible to the type of manipulation and abuse that we’re now seeing spreading across the country.”
Topham is firm in his intention to fight what he feels are spurious charges designed to silence debate on issues vital to both national and global peace. “If we cannot express our thoughts and ideas openly and freely,” he said, “then the democratic principles upon which Canada was founded become meaningless and dead and we might as well accept the fact that we are living in a communist dictatorship rather than a true democracy.”
Contact: Arthur Topham
Letter of Support from Ghost Troop Commander
Dear GT Topham,
All of Ghost Troop is honored by your membership in our group, and I consider it a personal honor to have known and worked with you since the summer of 2003. The kind of courage and conviction you have shown in publishing The Radical Press is a great irritation to Zionists in your Canada, my USA and the rest of the world. Falsehood always tries to legislate truth out of existence, and the actions taken against you and The Radical Press are the best proof possible that your labors are invaluable. I salute you!
Captain Eric H. May
The Lone Star Iconoclast
There you have the current Canadian witch-hunt update, and we tend to receive their machinations a few weeks afterwards – and we need to recall that the thought pattern, which sanctioned a pipe-bomb attack on Ernst Zundel during the 1980s in Toronto, is still flourishing in Canada.
Likewise we find this persecution through legal prosecition mentality well entrenched in Australia, the latest is in the matter of Adelaide resident David Hicks who has finally gained his freedom. Now Jewish lawyer and Labor candidate at the last Federal election, George Newhouse, claims that David Hicks should offer an apology to Australia’s Jewish community.
In the following article Newhouse even goes so far as to object to philosophical thoughts, which he would no doubt also like to censor. I see it as my God-given moral, social and legal duty to oppose such mental rape!
Newhouse calls on Hicks to renounce anti-Semitism
JANUARY 7, 2008
CONVICTED terrorist David Hicks must renounce terrorism and anti-Semitism, human-rights lawyer George Newhouse said last week.
Hicks, 32, was released from a South Australian prison last Saturday. He was charged by a US military commission for supporting terrorism and received a seven-year jail term, suspended for all but nine months, which he completed in Australia.
Five years earlier, Hicks was captured by US troops in Afghanistan and taken to Guantanamo Bay. There he was charged with various terrorism-related offences.
Newhouse said that Hicks “needs to renounce the offensive and deeply anti-Semitic views he has espoused previously. He needs to reassure Australian Jews that he no longer wants to rob or kill them.”
Hicks, who converted to Islam in 1999, allegedly told comrades at a guerrilla training camp in Pakistan that he wanted to “go back to Australia and rob and kill Jews”.
He said that he wanted to “crash a plane into a building”, and “go out with that last big adrenalin rush”, and that “if he were to go into a building of Jews with an automatic weapon or as a suicide bomber”, he would want to see the look on their faces before he kills them.
Newhouse argued that despite restrictions preventing Hicks from talking to the media about his crimes, he should still be able to publicly renounce terrorism and anti-Semitism.
The lawyer, who fought for two wrongly deported Australians, Vivian Alvarez and Cornelia Rau, and who is currently representing a 64-year-old woman who was subjected to a painful body search after police mistook her for a drug dealer, added that Australians are faced with a difficult conundrum because while Hicks did admit to supporting terrorism, it did take a long time for his case to be heard.
“His actions were violent and his philosophy offensive [emphasis added by AI] but the delay in bringing him to justice took too long,” Newhouse said.
Following his release from prison, Hicks said through his lawyer that he was not strong enough to talk to the media. http://www.ajn.com.au/news/news.asp?pgID=4717
It is good to see that such examples of free expression suppression are in the public domain because this illustrates how a Jewish conspiracy operates that aims to censor the Internet activities of those individuals who refuse to adopt a Jewish mind-set, a Jewish world-view framed by Talmud and Torah thought-patterns and saturated with Holocaust-Shoah beliefs.
In the following articles it becomes evident that the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah and the 9:11 official conspiracy theory are distorting our normal healthy understanding of what life is all about and twisting our value systems. When archives lock up details of historical events, then it is not possible to understand events that unfold before our eyes. It is still more impossible to understand historical events if – through legal persecution – our our thinking processes are switched off.
It is in the light of the above example of legal persecution and the continuation of my own response to Jeremy Jones’ legal actions on 28 February that I have compiled the January/February newsletters, which I am also submitting to the court for consideration:
Newsletter No 367 A-D offers a full cover of the nonsensical trial of barrister Sylvia Stolz in Mannheim, Germany. Imagine, after defending Ernst Zündel, she herself was charged with having violated Section 130 of the German Penal Code! We haven’t as yet reached this state of affairs in Australia because anything said in open court is privileged and cannot give rise to a charge. Sylvia’s crime is that she has embraced the Revisionist mindset, something that is a criminal matter in Germany.
No 368 features Steven Campbell’s attempt to screen Judea Declares War on Germany on a community TV station that prides itself never having in its over 3 decades of broadcasting censored anything submitted by citizens. Its Jewish manager broke this tradition by opposing the screening of Steven’s submitted DVD.
No 369 offers an interview with Captain Eric May, the gentleman who first exposed the 2003 Baghdad cover-up, as well as a comment by Joseph Huembs on Dr Mengele.
In No 370 there is Germar Rudolf’s classic article on the Holocaust – a good refresher.
No 371 contains Jürgen Graf’s expose of a French nationalist who claims the Revisionists don’t know what they’re doing and that nationalists ought to forget about the Holocaust. Graf shows how critical the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah is if we wish to understand our own heritage.
No 372 contains legal matters that, I hope, will proceed for a hearing when we resume on 28 February 2008.
I again welcome you to another year of battle-of-the-wills … Happy 2008.
Sent: Friday, 11 January 2008
The voices almost started a war!
U.S.: Voices on Recording May Not Have Been From Iranian Speedboats.
Chilling Threat Could Have Come From the Shore or Another Ship, Navy Says.
By MARTHA RADDATZ and JONATHAN KARL, Jan. 10, 2008—
Just two days after the U.S. Navy released the eerie video of Iranian speedboats swarming around American warships, which featured a chilling threat in English, the Navy is saying that the voice on the tape could have come from the shore or from another ship.
The near-clash occurred over the weekend in the Strait of Hormuz. On the U.S.-released recording, a voice can be heard saying to the Americans, "I am coming to you. You will explode after a few minutes."
The Navy never said specifically where the voices came from, but many were left with the impression they had come from the speedboats because of the way the Navy footage was edited.
Today, the spokesperson for the U.S. admiral in charge of the Fifth Fleet clarified to ABC News that the threat may have come from the Iranian boats, or it may have come from somewhere else.
We're saying that we cannot make a direct connection to the boats there," said the spokesperson. "It could have come from the shore, from another ship passing by. However, it happened in the middle of all the very unusual activity, so as we assess the information and situation, we still put it in the total aggregate of what happened
Sunday morning. I guess we're not saying that it absolutely came from the boats, but we're not saying it absolutely didn't."
The Iranians have denied using the threatening language and are saying U.S.-released video is fabricated. Today, the Iranian government aired its own video of the event on state-run TV there. On the audio, the voice that the Iranians say is the communication from their vessel can be heard identifying itself to the American ship, "Coalition warship No. 73 this is an Iranian navy patrol boat."
The incident ended without shots being fired, but senior defense officials told ABC News that the USS Hopper's gunners were within seconds of firing on the Iranians. Copyright (c) 2008 ABC News Internet Ventures
Report reveals Vietnam War hoaxes, faked attacks
Tue Jan 8, 9:45 AM ET
North Vietnamese made hoax calls to get the US military to bomb its own units during the Vietnam War, according to declassified information that also confirmed US officials faked an incident to escalate the war.
The report was released by the National Security Agency, responsible for much of the United States' codebreaking and eavesdropping work, in response to a "mandatory declassification" request, the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) said Monday.
From the first intercepted cable -a 1945 message from Vietnamese leader Ho Chi Minh to his Russian counterpart Joseph Stalin -- to the final evacuation of US spies from Saigon, the 500-page report retold Vietnam War history from the perspective of "signals intelligence," the group said in a statement.
During the war, North Vietnamese intelligence units sometimes succeeded in penetrating US communications systems, and they could monitor American message traffic from within, according to the report "Spartans in Darkness."
On several occasions "the communists were able, by communicating on Allied radio nets, to call in Allied artillery or air strikes on American units," it said.
"That's something I have never heard before," Steven Aftergood, director of the FAS project on government secrecy, told AFP.
But he said that probably the "most historically significant feature" of the declassified report was the retelling of the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident.
That was a reported North Vietnamese attack on American destroyers that helped lead to president Lyndon Johnson's sharp escalation of American forces in Vietnam.
The author of the report "demonstrates that not only is it not true, as (then US) secretary of defense Robert McNamara told Congress, that the evidence of an attack was 'unimpeachable,' but that to the contrary, a review of the classified signals intelligence proves that 'no attack happened that night,'" FAS said in a statement.
"What this study demonstrated is that the available intelligence shows that there was no attack. It's a dramatic reversal of the historical record," Aftergood said.
"There were previous indications of this but this is the first time we have seen the complete study," he said.
Début du message réexpédié:
*De: *Bocage firstname.lastname@example.org
*Date : *9 janvier 2008 01:20:31
HNEC Je reçois ce matin une nouvelle convocation de la police judiciaire (pour Le 24 janvier, veille de mon 79e anniversaire). Il s¹agit de la demande d¹ouverture d¹une enquête judiciaire formulée par Jacques Chirac à propos de ma participation à la conférence de Téhéran (11-12 décembre 2006).
Je vais être obligé de répéter qu¹il est normal que ³Supermenteur² (c¹est le sobriquet dont l¹avait affublé une célèbre émission satirique) s¹acharne à protéger un Supermensonge, celui du prétendu génocide des juifs et des prétendues chambres à gaz nazies. RF
Quick translation of Prof Robert Faurisson's statement:
On 24 January 2008, the day before my 79th birthday, I have been asked to appear before the criminal investigation department enquiring, at the request of former President Jaques Chirac, into my 11-12 December 2006 Teheran Holocaust Conference address. I shall be obliged to repeat that it is normal for a "Super liar" - a name given to him by a famous satirical TV program - to go on relentlessly protecting a Super lie, that of the alleged genocide of the Jews and of the alleged Nazi gas chambers.
Columbia professors plan to visit Iran to apologize to Ahmadinejad
Tehran: 18:19, 2008/01/08
NEW YORK (MNA) – An academic delegation of Columbia University professors and deans of faculties plans to visit Tehran to officially apologize to Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad. The delegation plans to express regret for the insulting remarks Columbia University President Lee Bollinger directed at Ahmadinejad on September 24 in his introductory speech, the Mehr News Agency correspondent in New York reported.
Since the incident, the deans and professors from the faculties of history, anthropology, Middle Eastern studies, philosophy, and Islamic studies have criticized Bollinger’s behavior toward Ahmadinejad.
A member of the delegation, who requested anonymity, said the main goal of the visit is to meet the Iranian president and officially apologize to him. “The delegation has also prepared its itinerary,” he noted. He went on to say that the delegation also plans to visit Iranian universities in various cities and to hold talks with professors and students, and may even sign memoranda of understanding with some universities. He also said the delegation is interested in visiting seminaries and the shrine city of Qom.
However, Bollinger has warned the delegation that their trip to Iran should be a private visit and should not be undertaken as an official visit endorsed by the university.
Bollinger has so far refused to meet the Mehr News Agency correspondent to explain his disrespectful behavior toward Ahmadinejad when introducing him to the students and professors at Columbia.
Persian Gulf incident part of U.S. psyops: Majlis speaker
TEHRAN, Jan. 8 (MNA) – Majlis Speaker Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel has described U.S. reports about a confrontation between Iranian speedboats and U.S. warships in the Persian Gulf as “part of a psychological and propaganda campaign against the Islamic Republic.”
U.S. defense officials on Sunday accused Iranian naval forces of threatening to blow up U.S. warships in the Strait of Hormuz, a charge Iranian officials vehemently denied.
“We have always shown that we believe in peace and avoiding tension, and we presume that the U.S. media propaganda is part of its psychological and propaganda campaign, which it is continuously conducting against Iran,” Haddad-Adel told reporters on Tuesday. “If one side should charge others of meddling in this region, that side would be Iran, because, unlike the Americans, who came from thousands of kilometers away and stationed their navy ships in the Persian Gulf, we are a natural neighbor of this waterway.”
Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad-Ali Hosseini also played down the incident, saying it was an issue of mistaken identity. “This happens between the two sides every once in a while, and after the two sides identify each other, the issue is resolved.” The incident was “similar to previous ones” that were resolved “once the two sides recognized each other,” Hosseini explained.
However, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice described the incident as “provocative” and “dangerous. It was provocative, and that kind of provocation is dangerous. I would sincerely hope that the Iranians would refrain from any such activity,” Rice told the BBC Arabic service.
Happy New Year 2008
from James Damon
I have always sensed an affiliation with the German nation which went beyond the presence of Germans in my family tree.
The following admonition by one of our Confederate generals seems appropriate to both the CSA and Germany, which were both devastated by the same unscrupulous enemy, using the same strategy of targeting and assaulting the civilian population.
The Meaning of Subjugation
Every man should endeavor to understand the meaning of subjugation before it is too late. It means the history of this heroic struggle will be written by the enemy; that our youth will be trained by Northern schoolteachers; will learn from Northern school books their version of the war; will be impressed by the influences of history and education to regard our gallant dead as traitors, and our maimed veterans as fit objects for derision.
- Maj. Gen. Patrick R. Cleburne, CSA, January, 1864.
Die Bedeutung von Unterwerfung
Ein jeder soll versuchen, die volle Bedeutung von Unterwerfung zu verstehen, bevor es zu spät ist. Unterwerfung bedeutet, daß der Feind die Geschichte dieses heldenhaften Kampfes schreibt. Unterwerfung bedeutet, daß feindliche Lehrer unsere Jugend erziehen und mit feindlichen Schulbüchern ihr eine feindliche Vorstellung des Krieges beibringen. Unterwerfung bedeutet, daß feindliche Interpretationen von Geschichte und Erziehung unsere Jugend beeinflußen, daß sie unsere tapfere Toten als Verräter und unsere verkrüppelte Veteranen als Objekte von Verachtung vorstellen.
- Maj. Gen. Patrick R. Cleburne, CSA, January 1864.
Greek neo-Nazi gets 14 months for book denying the Holocaust. By Jean Cohen, 13/Dec/2007
ATHENS (EJP)-A militant Greek neo-Nazi was sentenced to a 14-month suspended sentence on Thursday for inciting to hatred with his book denying the Holocaust.
After four days of trial, Costas Plevris, a lawyer, writer and presenter of a marginal TV station, was found guilty of inciting to hatred with his 1,400 page book titled Jews: the Whole Truth denying the Holocaust and containing offensive references to Jews.
In his book, the author writes: “To begin with, I declare that I am a Nazi, a fascist, a racist, an anti-democrat, an anti-Semite. Jews are mortal enemies and deserve the firing squad."
It was Greece’s first such trial under a anti-discrimination law passed in 1979.
Once Plevris’ book was published in May 2006, the Greek Helsinki Monitor, an NGO that monitors human rights in Greece, immediately filled a complaint against him under the law.
"We thank the Greek justice system for its dignity and for demonstrating that we truly live in a democratic society," Moses Costantinis, president of the Central Board of Jews of Greece, said after the trial.
Panayote Dimitras, from the Greek human rights organisation that initiated the case, called the judgement "historic".
Leaders of the umbrella group Central Board of Jewish communities in Greece (CJBG) testified at the court that the book has led to a spike in attacks on Jewish monuments in the country.
"After the book was published, attacks against Jewish sites increased," said Moses Costantinis, head of the Board, said.
On trial together with Plevris, the publisher, the editor and a journalist of the extreme-right weekly newspaper Elefteros Kosmos were found not guilty.
Benjamin Albalas, head of the Jewish Community of Athens, said before the court that the book "incites violence and encourages people to kill us."
Defence lawyers said their clients were being persecuted for freely expressing their views.
The Jewish community saw the trial as a key test of the Greek authorities’ determination to deal with anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial.
Töben pulls apology, denial material remains on website
Peter Kohn, Australian Jewish News, December 3, 2007
DESPITE a last-minute reversal, Adelaide Holocaust denier Dr Fredrick Töben will be held to an order from the Federal Court of Australia last week that he remove all material denying the Holocaust from his Adelaide Institute website by 4 pm on Wednesday (December 5).
Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ)'s Jeremy Jones, the successful applicant in a Federal Court of Australia hearing, told The AJN this week that Dr Töben's apparent backdown from an apology he gave for his contempt of court last Tuesday did not alter the circumstances.
Dr Töben gave an unqualified apology to an Adelaide sitting of the Federal Court before Justice Michael Moore last Tuesday for being in contempt of a 2002 Federal Court order to remove offending material from the website. But writing on his website, he has since withdrawn the apology and has announced a halt to removing Holocaust denial material from the website.
In a posting, Dr Töben referred to last week's story in The AJN and stated: "If the... interpretation is consistent with the consent order, then I hereby publicly state I am withdrawing from the consent agreement, and although I have begun deleting material from the website, as part of the undertaking given to the court and to the applicant, I am now stopping this action."
Jones told The AJN that Dr Töben's court statement "acknowledged that he had been in breach of orders and now what he is doing is stating there that he will be in contempt of further orders".
Justice Moore last Tuesday set February 28 as a provisional date on which the court would reconvene if Dr Töben had not complied with the December 5 deadline but Jones said he hopes the court will examine any breaches earlier than that.
Töben court hearing this week PETER KOHN, AJN, Dec 17, 2007
THE Federal Court is due to re-hear an application by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) against Adelaide Holocaust denier Dr Fredrick Töben, with a date to be set on Wednesday.
Dr Töben has failed to comply with a December 5 deadline set by the court in Sydney last month for him to remove all Holocaust denial material from the website of his Adelaide Institute.
He was given that deadline by Justice Michael Moore of the Federal Court at a November 27 hearing.
At that hearing, Dr Töben made an apology for ignoring the court's 2002 ruling to remove Holocaust denial material from his website and to not replace it with new material.
But some days later he retracted his apology and also announced on his website that he would halt the removal of material.
Lawyer Steven Lewis of legal firm Slater & Gordon, representing the ECAJ, told The AJN: "He has masked certain parts of it. The orders required him to take down all the material and he hasn't."
Dr Töben has made comments on his website about an AJN story reporting his apology to the court. In an article titled Bending To Jewish Pressure, he accused the newspaper of "gloating about the settlement".
The Adelaide revisionist, who addressed Iran's notorious Holocaust denial conference in December last year, was to take part in this week's directions court hearing by video link.
Dr Fredrick Töben
From: Ed Ball
Sent: Saturday, 1 Dec 2007
Subject: Jones should be indebted to Töben
Could you expand on this thought and present it to help the court understand the way the public is programmed by the media to believe irrational ideas when, if they thought independently, they would believe something different?
Rather than being "hurt" when Fred Toben publishes evidence that in WW2 Germans did not kill six million Jews, Jeremy Jones and other Jewish people should be delighted and grateful to Mr Toben for showing their relatives did not die but were misplaced during the social upheavals during and after the war.
Rather than charging Mr. Toben with hurting them, Mr. Jones and other Jews should be congratulating Tobin and sending him money to continue writing and publishing which will give hope to Jewish people who search the internet for previously believed lost relatives.
John Ball email@example.com
From: Mel Fowler firstname.lastname@example.org
Sent: Friday, 30 November 2007
Subject: FOR THE RECORD
". . these creatures, to whom honour and principle are alien concepts . ."
It's not that Jews don't understand honour and principle. They know what they are: they just don't live by them in the context of dealing with non-Jews in the pursuit of long-term Jewish goals. Remember, they haven't joined the human race yet. The world is THEIR turf - no one else's.
". . it is futile to come to [what one supposes is] an honourable agreement with Jews."
Jews are not looking for a peaceable settlement as you are. They are dedicated to their program of ultimately crushing you and your kind. If you want your experience to be meaningful to others, you must present it in meaningful and true form.
Sent: Friday, 11 January 2008
Subject: Re: FW: Hard Questions for Revisionist Donald Cassidy
Dear Captain May,
Regarding your request for documentation on the post-World War II deaths of 1.5 million German veterans perhaps the best available are the two books by French Canadian author James Bacque: Crimes and Mercies and Other Losses linked below:
Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950 (Paperback)
by James Bacque (Author)
Bacque was severely vilified in the media for bringing this unknown genocide to the worlds attention but no one has yet refuted his arguements. Even the late Stephen Ambrose grudingly aknowledged it. The Jews - and the American establishement to their shame- have been at great pains to keep this atrocity deep down in the Orwellian memory hole for decades since its exposure to the public would shame the “greatest generation” and blacken the "just good war" label that goes with WW2 and all that other nonsense that goes with it.
This killing was actually intended to be much larger - they estimated 10s of millions dead - and part of the preplanned "Morgenthau Plan" named after the Jew Henry J Morganthau Jr. Contrary to official Allied history Stalin, Churchill and FDR all initially agree to it back at Yalta, partners in genocide! You can read the text
of the document here:
So unlike the phony Jewish Holohoax of which there are absolutely no documents, signatures, etc to prove it the Morgenthau Plan/German Holocaust is well documented in this plan.
I have placed more links below relating to it also.
Reality of real denial in Palestine
Top | Home
©-free 2008 Adelaide Institute