001/05: Demokratie und einiges mehr
No. 1/05: Democracy
and Some Other Things
Translated by J M
The original is posted on several sites including
political repression in Germany, combined with that
country’s insistence on human rights in China and
elsewhere, has renewed interest in the case of Horst
Following is a
translation of one of his revelatory articles called
“Bombshells” that moved the “Federal Republic”
to impose a prison sentence of 13 years on the 74 year
old dissident attorney.
The greatest success of the Reich’s enemies lies in
their having so disoriented and deranged the Germans
with their satanic brainwashing (called
“UMERZIEHUNG” OR “re-education - also known as
“de-education”), that they are completely
incapable of defending themselves.
The Germans have reached the point where they believe
their enemies’ most fantastical and culturally
They perceive their greatest virtue, loyalty to Volk
and Fatherland, as depraved fatuousness.
In short, they see themselves through the eyes of
their worst enemies.
And yet, nobody ever asked the Germans if they wanted
to be “liberated from National Socialism and
They did, after all, remain loyal to Adolf Hitler to
the bitter end.
Has any nation in modern times exhibited a greater
willingness for sacrifice or struggled more valiantly
against “liberation” – fought to the last
cartridge -- than the German Reich?
Was it Count Coudenhove-Kalergi who in 1925 expressed
the essence of democracy in the following words?
Democracy is nothing more than a facade for
Because the nations
no longer tolerate naked plutocracy, their masters
allow them nominal power, while retaining factual
power in the hands of the plutocrats.
In republican as well
as monarchical democracies the statesmen are but
puppets and the capitalists are their string-pullers.
dictate national policy guidelines and control the
electorate by manufacturing public opinion,
controlling the ministers through their financial and
social connections.” (ADEL, p. 31)
Pope Benedict XVI expressed similar views while he was
still Cardinal Ratzinger.
He wrote the following in 1988:
that democracy is not the best form of freedom is
common and growing; the Marxist critique cannot simply
How free are
To what extent do a
few power wielders manipulate public opinion through
advertising, which is capital?
Isn’t there an
oligarchy that decides what is “modern” and
“progressive” and what the citizens are supposed
The cruelty of this
oligarchy, including its willingness to carry out
public executions, is sufficiently known.
Whoever stands in its
way is ‘an enemy of Freedom’ since he is
‘hindering the free expression of opinion.’
And what about the
‘expression of the people’s will’ in the
committees of ‘democratic representation?’
Who can still believe
that the common good is the determining factor for the
Who can still have
doubts about the power of the interests whose dirty
hands grow ever more obvious?
And furthermore: is
the system of majority vs. minority really a
Aren’t the myriad
interest groups more powerful than official political
In this confusion of
powers, the problem of ungovernability comes ever more
ominously to the surface.
The mutual, opposing
determination to have one’s way is blocking the
freedom of all.”
For additional clarification we should also consider
Noam Chomsky’s analysis of the kind of government
the power elite calls “Democracy” in order to
mislead simple souls.
In the following analysis, Noam Chomsky clarifies the
true nature of contemporary “Democracy.”
At the beginning of the Third Millennium he wrote:
“Let us examine the
teachings that are said to form the basis for modern
forms of political democracy.
These are to be found
in an important handbook of the Public Relations
industry bearing the descriptive title
Its author, Edward
Bernays, a nephew of Sigmund Freud, contributed
greatly to the development of wartime propaganda and
went on to become a leading personality in the field
of commercial propaganda or advertising.
transference of the drive for sex and status to
cigarette smoking, he caused millions of cancer
At the very beginning
Bernays remarks: ‘The deliberate and intelligent
manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of
the masses is an important element in democratic
To carry out this
essential task the intelligent minorities must make
use of propaganda continuously and systematically,
because they alone understand the mental processes and
social patterns of the masses and can pull the wires
that control the public mind.
Therefore our society
has consented to permit free competition for
organization by leadership and propaganda, another
case of consent without consent.
the leadership with a mechanism to mold the mind of
the masses so that they will throw their newly gained
strength in the desired direction.
The leadership can
regiment the public mind every bit as much as an army
regiments the bodies of its soldiers.
This process of
engineering consent is the very essence of the
Bernays wrote that
the ‘Consensus for Organization’ belongs to the
‘essence of the democratic process’ shortly before
he was honored by the American Psychological
Association for his contributions, in 1949.”
[Footnote 4]; also online at <www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Chomsky/ConsentPOP_Chom.html?]
With few words and unsurpassed precision, the
PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION have reduced universal
sufferage, Democracy’s “holiest of holies,” to
“In order to
achieve this goal [world Jewish domination], we must
introduce universal suffrage beforehand, without
distinctions of class and wealth.
Then the masses of
people will decide everything; and since it [universal
suffrage] is controlled by us [through the media: HM]
we will achieve through it the absolute majority,
which we could never achieve if only the educated and
possessing classes had the vote.”
In examining the world situation since the Jews
invented universal suffrage we note that results
everywhere have closely followed the predictions
contained in the Protocols.
The world does not realize the significance of the
Zionist Press in establishing the present tyranny of
In the 20th Century the Christian churches were
deprived of their role as mentors of Western
They were deposed by Mass Media, the principal power
of modern times.
In their persistent and secretive campaign of conquest
the plutocrats have taken over the media, with the
result that today they determine the Weltanschauung of
Egotism now provides the central perspective.
God and the Commonwealth have been displaced,
and truth has been replaced by profitability.
Our cunning secret rulers have discovered that nearly
everyone can be made to believe almost anything if the
rulers suggest that “everyone believes it.”
The result is that most people believe whatever
benefits the plutocrats, since the plutocrats
constantly suggest that everyone believes that
whatever is good for the plutocrats is good for all
This technology of Consciousness Control provides the
basis for the tyranny of terror that supports the
Under this tyranny there are two deadly sins: doubting
the “Value of Freedom” and questioning
In order to protect themselves from empirical truth,
the plutocrats avail themselves of verbal cudgels such
as “conspiracy theorist,” “anti Semite,”
“self-hater” (in case the doubter is Jewish),
“racists,” “Nazi,” “Holocaust
Denier” etc. which are calculated to crush the will
of the independent thinker.
The Enlightenment principle that ideas should be
evaluated on the basis of whether they are true or
false, supported by empirical evidence, has apparently
The interest of the plutocrats has become the standard
for evaluating every intellectual opinion and
Under cover of the euphemism “re-education,” a
totalitarian thought police has been imposed on
It has no counterpart in all history.
In the so-called “Federal Republic of Germany”
there is no such thing as independent journalism.
There are no independent foundations dedicated to
researching contemporary history, no independent
courts capable of conducting debate on the subject of
the German Reich with the object of establishing
There are no independent publishers of lexicons, no
schoolbooks oriented around historical fact, no
freedom of expression, and no free and independent
The intellectual enslavement of Germany is
unmistakable in Section 130 of the Penal Code.
Section 130 is strongly reminiscent of the repressive
laws of National Socialism, and the position of the
“courts” that apply it against citizens of the
Reich is clearly precarious.
In the courtrooms of the Federal Republic of Germany-OMF,
empirical truth is clearly suppressed by the official
lies of our enemies.
[OMF = “Organizational Form of a Modality of Foreign
Rule,” the descriptive term for the occupation
government of Germany that was created by Prof. Carlo
Schmidt, the author of the Federal Republic’s Basic
Law, in order to avoid the term “puppet
Despite everything, let us be of good cheer.
We have no reason to doubt that the truth will
ultimately prevail - for the simple reason that it
exists and is accessible to those who seek it.
Lies cannot prevail once the truth is known!
30 August 2005
 Coudenhove-Kalergi, son of the Austrian
ambassador in Japan and his Japanese wife, was a
He developed the idea of a united “Pan Europe” and
proposed that Europe unite in a political and economic
In 1924 he founded the Paneuropean Union, the oldest
European unification movement.
Its membership included Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann
and Konrad Adenauer.
Thus Count Coudenhove-Kalerge was a prophet and
mastermind of the “European Idea,” self-image and
In contrast to present day European Union, however
Kalergi saw Europe primarily as an economic and
political entity, a counterweight to the USA, Russia
The principal aspects of Kalergi’s concept of Europe
were freedom, peace, prosperity and culture.
Present day Europe has adopted the self-image that
Kalergi advocated immediately following World War I.
Kalergi called upon France and Germany to set aside
their differences and concentrate instead on what they
had in common.
In his view the Scandinavian countries should take the
initiative and attempt to act as go-between in the
rest of Europe.
However, Kalergi’s ideas were quickly forgotten when
World War II broke out.
During the Third Reich, the concept of a pan European
Union was suppressed.
In 1938 he immigrated first to Switzerland and finally
to the USA, where he became a professor of history at
New York University.
Coudenhove-Kalergi remained true to his ideals until
his death in 1972, and was pleased and optimistic
about developments in Europe following World War II.
He was particularly enthusiastic about Winston
Churchill’s 1947 speech, which adopted the central
points of his program.
On 18 May 1950 he received the first international
Charlemagne Prize awarded by the city of Aachen for
outstanding contributions to European unification.
In June 1950 he presented his concept for a European
flag to the European Council.
However, his proposal was disapproved on account
of Turkey’s opposition to the red cross in the
middle of the flag.
In August 1955 he suggested that Beethoven’s scoring
of Schiller’s “Ode to Joy” be adopted as the
official European anthem.
In 1972 this became the official hymn of the European
Council and in 1985 of the European Union.
Following Coudenhove-Kalergi’s death in 1972, his
longtime Vice President Otto von Habsburg became
President of the International Paneuropean Union.
When Winston Churchill was awarded the Charlemagne
Prize in 1955, Coudenhove Kalergi received the GROßKREUZ
DES BUNDESVERDIENSTORDENS, the highest decoration of
the Federal Republic.
 Cardinal Ratzinger „Freiheit und Wahrheit“
in Jürgen Schwab, Otto Scrinzi, Über die
Revolution von 1848 Aula-Verlag, Graz 1998
 Edward Bernays is included among the
thousand most important persons of all time. See
 Excerpt from Noam Chomsky „Profit over
People – Neoliberalismus und globale Weltordnung“,
Europa Verlag, 2001, pp. 54-.
 Protocols of the Elders of Zion, 10th Sitting,
Wallstein Publishing House, ISBN 3-89244-191-x, p. 60
 Caspar von Schrenck-Notzing, „Charakterwäsche
– Die Politik der amerikanischen Umerziehung in
Deutschland“, Ullstein Verlag, Berlin 1996, pp. 118
The translator is a “Germanophilic Germanist” who
attempts to make noteworthy German articles accessible
to Germanophiles who do not read German.
Here's freedom to him
who would speak,
Here's freedom to him
who would write;
For there's none ever
feared that the truth should be heard,
Save him whom the
truth would indict!