Siegfried Verbeke

Belgium's and Europe's Revisionist Powerhouse

Siegfried Verbeke now resting in:

 

Gevangenis

Zwarte Brugstraat 4
B-8500 HASSELT

Belgium

__________ 

26 December 2006

Siegfried has been arrested again by Belgium police

 

From: Bocage bocage@club-internet.fr


Sent: Wednesday, 24 January 2007 6:37 AM
Subject: Où en est Siegfried Verbeke?


On se souvient que, arrêté à l'aéroport d'Amsterdam alors qu'il s'apprêtaità se rendre aux Philippines avec sa femme originaire de ce pays, le révisionniste belge Siegfried Verbeke s'était retrouvé incarcéré en Allemagne où il avait dû purger 9 mois de prison (du 3 août 2005 au 5 mai 2006), pour révisionnisme, évidemment.

Le 16 décembre 2006 nous annoncions (n/message intitulé "Le révisionniste belge S. Verbeke à nouveau emprisonné") qu'il venait d'être à nouveau emprisonné la veille, 15 décembre, mais nous avions du mal à éclaircir le motif exact de cette incarcération.

En réalité, cette arrestation correspond à l'arrêt rendu par la Cour d'appel d'Anvers le 14 avril 2005 condamnant Siegfried (et son frère) à un an de prison ferme: Siegfried et Herbert Verbeke avaient été poursuivis par le Centre pour l'Egalité des chances et par la Fondation Auschwitz "pour la diffusion d¹ouvrages clairement racistes et négationnistes via leur organisation VHO (Vrij Historisch Onderzoek)" et parce que "ces ouvrages étaient envoyés spontanément aux écoles, bibliothèques, juristes, etc.". Le tribunal correctionnel d¹Anvers avait, par jugement du 9 septembre 2003, condamné les deux frères (dont Herbert par défaut) pour infractions à la loi sur le "négationnisme" et la loi sur le racisme, à une année avec sursis et une amende de 2.500 euros; ils perdaient leurs droits civils et politiques pour une période de dix ans; le Centre et la Fondation Auschwitz recevaient chacun 1 euro de dommage.

Or, comme dit plus haut, le 14 avril 2005 la Cour d¹appel d¹Anvers a confirmé ce jugement mais en portant la peine de prison à un an ferme "car les prévenus ne témoignent d¹aucun regret alors que leurs idées doivent être considérées comme un poison dangereux qui est une menace réelle pour la démocratie", peut-on lire sur le site du Centre pour l'Egalité des chances. C'est cette condamnation que Siegfried est en train de purger. Il a d'abord été incarcéré à la prison d'Ypres mais se trouve actuellement - depuis vendredi 19 janvier - à la prison de Hasselt. On peut écrire à ce valeureux et infatigable militant du révisionnisme à l'adresse suivante:

 

Siegfried Verbeke

Gevangenis

Zwarte Brugstraat 4
B-8500 HASSELT

Belgium

 

_________________________________________________

 

REVISIONISTS DO NOT FEAR PRISON OR DEATH

A matter of world views

On paying 1,000 euros bail, and nine months later, Siegfried Verbeke was released on Friday 5 May 2006. His passport has been confiscated and he is restricted to living either in Belgium or Germany. 

His release may have been connected with the Iranian 'Holocaust' cartoon competition.  There was a TV program about it where mention was made of Revisionists being imprisoned for their beliefs. 

Siegfried has filed a complaint for "illegal extradition" from Holland and for that he will be defended by an energetic Jewish lawyer called Dr. Rosenthal.

Fredrick Töben comments - 11 May 2006

Dr Michael Rosenthal refuses to defend Revisionists at the fact-stage of trials because this is a matter that cannot be contested in court. He refused to do my case as ordered by the court - and used the excuse that I did not want him because I objected to him for being a Jew - something that is not true. However, he will defend at the appeal stage because that is purely a legal matter. I had the same situation in Australia while facing action in the Federal Court. I could not find any defence counsel who was prepared to defend me at the factual stage of the proceedings. When we went into appeal, a lawyer defended me for free because he objected to the Racial Discrimination Law on grounds that it is offensive to free speech, which it is, of course. He is now a Supreme Court judge in Victoria.

Note that Horst Mahler, Sylvia Stolz, et al, have left this rather safe position and gone on the offensive by presenting the German legal system with a legal challenge: Owing to a revision in matters of fact on the 'Holocaust', the legal principle of 'Offenkundigkeit' - 'obviousness-common knowledge', needs to be revised as well. For example, a statement that is currently set in legal concrete is: 'During World War Two, as a state policy, Germans systematically exterminated six million European Jews mainly in homicidal gas chambers.' Anyone who publicly refuses to believe in this statement will be criminalised and sent to prison, as is the case with Ernst Zündel, Germar Rudolf, Günter Kögel, Wolfgang Fröhlich, and others. However, the latest 2002 research by Fritjof Meyer concludes that this is a false statement of fact.

Hence, if the German judiciary is to retain any credibility at all, then it must revise its attitude towards enforcing or retaining Section 130 of the Penal Code that criminalises anyone who refuses to believe in the 'Holocaust' dogma.

It is therefore obvious that lawyers operating only at the legal principle level are far less courageous than those who are factually challenging Section 130 in court.

That the Iranian President has weighed into the debate is of extreme significance because he is directly challenging the emergence of a new religion - the 'Holocaust' religion. His letter to President George W Bush is a classic example of a moral man assuming the initiative for conflict resolution. If President Bush does not respond to the letter, then that will indicate a lack of good will, and Bush's only avenue out of this moral dilemma is to initiate a physical catastrophe that will deflect the shame Bush must feel in not being able to be civil/courteous towards another world statesman.  

But how can Bush be civil towards the Iranian President when Bush has already publicly defamed this man by labelling Dr Ahmadinejad as being one of the members of the 'Axis of Evil'?

The letter incident shows how civilised Iranians are. By seeking a dialogue the Iranian President has used a method of communication that a bully-boy rarely appreciates on account of being non-verbal, where reason and understanding are subordinate to brute force. President Bush uses slogans, such as 'freedom and democracy and war against terrorism', that are unimaginative and one-dimensional, and in which President Bush reveals the hypocritical nature of US politics.

The next turn of events in world politics will be played out in June when Germany hosts the World Cup. When the Iranian football team play their match in Nürnberg, alone for the historical nature of the city this match will be significant.

German newspapers report US reaction to letter as Nutzlos - useless; commentators claim it is just a 'show'. How they underestimate the situation!

Farsi hate websites worry Holocaust group.

Letters: Iran's Holocaust denier - International Herald Tribune WEDNESDAY, MAY 10, 2006 - I disagree with Roger Cohen's assertion that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran should not be allowed to attend the soccer World Cup until he retracts his denial of the Holocaust and his calls for the annihilation of Israel. ("A fan of the World Cup who should stay home," Globalist, May 6).

Iran to Bush: You're not Christian enough

Keep tuned - meanwhile look at how absurd one claim from 1979 about the gassing story now appears.

_________________________________

 

- this address now obsolete - but for future reference we leave it here!

Siegfried Verbeke #207

J.V.A.

Oberer Fauler Felz 1

 D-69117 Heidelberg

Germany

_________________________________________

 

Countries where the HOLOCAUST DOGMA  is legally protected

Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Israel, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland

 

Verbeke to be extradited to Germany                       

China's Xinhua reports                                              

Belgian Holocaust denier held at Schiphol             

His arrest at Amsterdam 3 August 2005                

  Siegfried Verbeke challenges James Randi 2004   

Siegfried Verbeke sentenced 2003                         

_______________________________________________________________

From: Dieter Greve

Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:29 AM

Subject: RA-MR 12 Jahre politischer Häftling der OMF/BRD

Sehr verehrte, liebe Netzpostempfänger,

in seinem Rundbrief Nr. 4/2006 schreibt unser Freiheitskämpfer Rechtsanwalt Manfred Roeder, daß er mit seiner letzten Inhaftierung insgesamt 12 Jahre Haft hinter sich hat, ebenso lange, wie das Dritte Reich gedauert hat. Er ist damit der am längsten inhaftierte politische Kämpfer in der OMF/BRD! RA Manfred Roeder hat noch nie irgendeinem Menschen Schaden zugefügt oder ein Tier gequält, immer nur offen und direkt seine Meinung geäußert. Aber Gesinnungstäter werden in der OMF/BRD gnadenlos verfolgt, unbarmherziger als jeder Mörder oder Gewohnheitsverbrecher. Jede vorzeitige Entlassung aus der politischen Inhaftierung wurde mit dem stupiden Argument abgelehnt: es bestünde Wiederholungsgefahr, weil RA MR an seiner Überzeugung festhielte, das deutsche Volk von seinem Schuldkomplex zu befreien. Wenn jedoch jemand am Schuldkomplex und an der deutschen Alleinkriegsschuld rüttelt, gefährdet das gesamte Nachkriegssystem der OMF/BRD. DAS DARF JEDOCH NICHT SEIN!

Mit volkstreuem Gruß

Dieter Greve

 

Top | Home

©-free 2007 Adelaide Institute