|
|
Ron Owen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Owen" b3969976@spiderweb.com.au
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 12:12 AM
Subject: Thank You All
To all our treasured Friends
29 October 2003
Media Release. From Ron Owen
For an Further Information phone 07 54 825070
Is the Justice System a Tool of
Oppression.
Rights. A Trial by Jury
Wrongs. That Legislation is enacted on a
production line basis, where the parliamentary draftsmen who write the
legislation have less idea about the subject as asking John Farnham to
write the Brandenburg Concerto. Politicians consult with interested Groups
and tell them that to "Cop it Sweet " or they will make it
worse. The Legislation is not even read by the politicians, a first and
second reading is only ceremonial, they are never read and the politicians
vote not on the interests of their constituents but on the instructions of
their party. When Judges and Police admit that the Weapons Act 1990 is
in-comprehensible, contradictory, and "the worst example of
Parliamentary drafting", amendments just increase its size
multiplying its problems and insuring oppression.
Wrongs: Legislation should protect the
weak against the strong, instead it leaves them defenceless, to be preyed
upon by villains (home invasions, protection rackets, defenceless
shopkeepers, Ring 000 and Die) and harassed by a million bureaucratic
paper nightmares. Make a mistake, make an incorrect payment, forget a
renewal, and you are the hunted game, sport for a police force.
Wrongs: That Police can find "Rubber
Stamp" Justices of the Peace who do not have to read or understand
any grounds for charges. That the DPP can keep producing indictments
"Ex Officio" to fit the charge, when in court they are shown to
be defective, they go away and produce another lot. The Grand Jury used to
be a system to review indictments before defendant are financial broken by
the system, it was done away with by politicians who are supposed to
protect us. Even when the defendant wins no compensation is returned by
the State for immense legal costs. Defendants are forced to plead guilty,
attempting to obtain some mercy, as they have no hope of affording a
defence. The Police use this to up their conviction ratio.
Wrongs : That you
can be taken of the street and summarily convicted by a Magistrate for two
years without the protection of a Jury of your peers. That "Person
other than offenders liable to penalties". That all of your licences
will be revoked, lose millions of dollars invested in a business, if a
policemen states that he has information that you have associated with a
criminal. If you appeal, the Policeman faces a five year penalty if he
reveals his source of information, you are not allowed in the appeal court
while Policeman is giving information, nor is your Lawyer. The transcript
is unavailable to the appellant the media are not allowed in the appeal
court. The process to appeal this appeal decision by Judicial Review Act
1992 has been revoked.
Wrongs :The ambiguity of legislation,
which is so incomprehensible, that a strict interpretation, by one person
turns black into white for another. For example, ask a lawyer how many
holes are in a garden hose, he says, "two", ask an engineer he
says "one". This example was one of many that came to light in
this court case.
Options :The Ordinary Individual has to do
his duty and take a greater part in the Justice System. You may want to;
1. Leave it to the Politicians, most who are lawyers anyway, 2. Lock yourself away on an un-inhabited Island, 3. Go mad trying to comply with everything. 4. One of your family members is locked away for mis-interpretation of a Regulation.
Laws
Politicians and the Legal Profession have no doubt in the power of parliament to legislate black into white, but fail to recognise that they are subjects to the Natural Laws or ‘Rule of Law', themselves. They do not have the power to change the laws of Motion or Gravity nor do they have the power to use the Justice System as a tool of oppression.
Ron Owen
|
©-free 2003 Adelaide Institute