Polacco de Ménasce (A Jew who strongly takes issue with the
we know, in the course of History, of an ethnic group which would not
rejoice when learning that, in a war ended fifty years before, it had
suffered many less losses than it thought?
Would the discoverer of such good piece of news, not be rewarded,
celebrated? Would he be overwhelmed with heavy fines, would he escape
attempted murder, as such was the case with Professor Faurisson?
Do such reactions not belong to a heavy case of psychopathy?
the live skeletons which can be seen in such films as “ Night and Fog”
(by Alain Resnais), have anything to do with gassing? Are they not the
result of famine in the camps because of the systematic bombing of German
towns containing more than 100,000 people, “holocausting” hundreds of
thousands of women and children who are never mentioned?
would have been the 4 million Jews ( if we consider that 2 millions were
killed in battlefields), when it is well known that one camp could not
contain more than 60,000 thousand people, and that except in Auschwitz,
there was no zyclon
B gas-chambers? ( there
never was any proof of mass gasing with any other gas).
the witnesses worth anything, when you know that torture was the way to
squeeze out evidence. Such was the case of
Commandant Hoess whose ludicrous declaration has become a legend .
What about the 100 witnesses of gassing in Dachau,
when it is official that there was no gas chamber in that camp?
kilos of coal are necessary for the cremation of one dead body. We are told
that the Germans cremated 1300
corpses a day. U.S.A aircraft took hundreds of pictures of Auschwitz, during
the supposed period of the holocaust. (
1943-44). Why is there not a single gigantic heap of
the necessary coal? Why not a single black coil
do radio, films, press, T.V., continue daily to inflict upon us the myth of
the six-million-gas-chambers, in a never ending whining and moaning? Why is
the Jewish lobby chasing, 50
years after the end of the war, nonagenarians who attempted to rescue
Germany from the iniquity of the Versailles treaty, from the rot of the
Weimar Republic, from the
collapse of German youth,
from the unemployment of 6 million people, who, back to work could
give bread to the 21,500,000 persons who were dependent on them?
does the AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, issue 43, page 666, inform us that in
1941, there were 3.300.000 Jews in occupied Europe?
is it possible that the gas chambers could be just near the crematoria, when
any chemist will tell you that zyclon B is hyperflammable?
are revisionist historians persecuted when they demonstrate the hoax of the
Shoa? A scientific dialogue, a
court-ordered appraisal have been demanded since 1980 about a problem
specifically arithmetic and technical. It would seal truth for ever. It
would definitively shut
the mouths. Such was the case for Katyn, thanks to the revisionist
could zyclon B gas 1000 people at one time, when it is well known that the
USA gas chamber for one ( maximum 2) persons sentenced to death, are of an
unheard of complexity and cost? Why,
at the trial of the Degesh,
which fabricated the cyclon B,
was it declared in 1949, that gassing in such conditions is impossible and
did Leuchter, who was in charge of the maintenance of
the USA gas chambers, give the firm evidence that there was no
gassing in Auschwitz? Why have Austrian and Polish reports confirmed the
Leuchter report? Why is the
Rudolf report, which analyses all results, forbidden? Why are those who
divulge the Rudolf report, heavily sentenced by the law. And yet
the slightest care of the quality and accuracy of the report
is not taken…
was, for the first time in History, the doctor’s degree of Mr Roques, on
the “ Gerstein report” cancelled? And still, this report was not
accepted at the Nuremberg trial!
Besides, the well known historian, a socialist
minister, Alain Decaux, mentioned in the press that “ nobody could
have access to the Gerstein report, without passing first through
the excellent thesis of Mr Roques”…Alain Decaux said: “I
admired the skill and perfection
of a “chartist”
performed by M.Roques in his doctor’s degree on the Gerstein report”. (
in his book: “La guerre absolue” 1998)
did Raymond Aron and François Furet at
a Sorbonne seminar, ( to
which no revisionist was invited), state that
there was not the slightest trace of a written or oral order for the
extermination of the Jews?
is it never spoken of the planning of the extermination of the Germans by
sterilisation of German men, as
expressed in a book written by the Jew Kaufmann (“Germany must perish”),
It is undoubtedly a small detail…
could cyclon B, used by the Germans for hygiene since 1920, be used in the
concentration camps for other
purposes than delousing and
protection against typhus? Why could large quantities of zyclon B
be found in camps where it is official that there never was any
do they harp on the “six-million-gas-chamber” and never on the 80
million Goyim exterminated in the USSR, by an entirely jewish political
regime, the executioners of which bore the names of Kaganovitch, Yagoda,
Frenkel, Firine, Jejoff, Ourenski, Rappaport, and fifty other Jews…?
during the Zundel trial in Canada, did the famous exterminationist Jews
disgrace themselves by talking of “ poetic licence” in their holocaust
assertions, and never came back
when summoned by the judges?
the Fabius-Gayssot law ? ( the man of the contaminated blood and the
Communist dragging along 200,000,000
it not the supreme proof of the fake? Is it not casting out the nines?
There is no need of stalino-Orwellian law « to be put in
prison because of one’s beliefs » ( thought crime of « 1984 »)
as stated M. Toubon, before he became a minister of Justice in France, to
set up truth. This law is
anticonstitutional, antidemocratic, against the rights of men. Any facts,
proofs, pros and cons, are what
we need. Professor Faurisson besought for the granting of a forum with an
unlimited number of contradictors: he never obtained it.
L’abbé Pierre did ask
for it : they pretended to grant it but refused it almost immediately.
The forum did take place on a T.V channel at Lugano. It was a
complete success for the Revisionists and was broadcast twice. Nobody knows
it as the media at the beck and call of the Jewish lobby, move their little
finger only when authorised.
is it that, when a professor
declares that the holocaust is an arithmetic and technical ineptitude, he is
forthwith dismissed! This, for the first time in History,
sets up the insane
concept of religious historical dogma, which in case of non perennial
worship, is doomed to be struck by the lightning of the inquisition of a
did the EXPRESS,a famous French
newspaper, in January 1995, assert that the gas-chamber shown for decades in
Auschwitz I, was reconstructed after the war, and that all that concerns it,
the way, a corpse soaked in cyanide acid, with lungs full of this gas, does
it not explode in a crematorium???!!!
did the historian, Jacques Baynac (an antirevisionist) assert that there was
no possibility whatsoever to prove the existence of gas-chambers? ( in
articles of the “Nouveau quotidien de Lausanne” dated
3 and 4 september 1996).
is a negationist: he who refuses to examine facts, evidence, experts
reports, or the one who takes
all relevant facts in consideration? A NON-revisionist historian is anything
you want except a historian! A historian is by definition “revisionist”.
is it that M.Roubeix, a chief executive
for 20 years of the factory in Saint Avold, producing cyanid acid (
zyclon B) asserted categorically that all that
was said about the german gas chambers was pure humbug?
There was actually a holocaust of 60 million people in
a war declared in 1933 by the Jews against Hitler.
Hitler had given bread to 6 million unemployed, he had rejected the
dictatorship of the dollar and the Jewish totalitarianism which pollute man
and the planet and which is
called “democracy” by semantic mystification.
Only two parties are left: the totalitarian judeopathy, exterminating
man and the planet, and Nationalism
for the Goyim not yet cankered by capitalisto-marxist
« L’école des Chartes » is a famous French school
where learned men study carefully ancient documents, texts and
This journalist does not know, or pretends not to know the arithmetico-technical
realities of the holocaust, but still, what he writes is exceptional and
Top of Page | Home Page
©-free 2003 Adelaide Institute